Yes, RGKey looks fantastic. But, he had exceptionally short legs and a very big, broad upper body to begin with.
Quote from: Tall on August 14, 2014, 01:59:20 PMYes, RGKey looks fantastic. But, he had exceptionally short legs and a very big, broad upper body to begin with.
He was under average in everything. Wingspan. Sitting torso height. so i would not advice 10 cm. I would advice 8 cm though that is the highest and i will probably doing that soon,
Dear God what am I reading??? 
Newbies know better. Now that's a new one for me.
Go ahead, ruin your lifes. What do I care anyway.
Quote from: Sweden on August 14, 2014, 11:05:57 PMNewbies know better. Now that's a new one for me.
Get real. I'm also a LL patient, just like you, not a newbie.
Quote from: exclide on August 14, 2014, 08:41:13 AMRGKEY did 9cm on tibia and he looks cool.
It's proven to recover fully after 2 years, with no connection to amount lengthened.
Same as proportions.
Same as athletic ability.
Muscles don't atrophy, if you use them. Nothing to do with amount lengthened.
Doesn't happen, unless you're retarded or 5 years old. In either case, you shouldn't be doing LL.
f**k your safe zone.
Irresponsible quote , think b4 u write anything stupid . Because of u someone is really gonna get hurt real bad . I have already done CLL and experienced its up n down .
That safe zone u want to f**k is a realistic and life saver for everyone
.
Quote from: exclide on August 15, 2014, 12:36:31 AMGet real. I'm also a LL patient, just like you, not a newbie.
Maybe you're not a newbie, but you're not very clever. 10cm tibia lengthening is a bad idea, most doctors won't even lengthen above 6cm and you're saying 10cm is no problem at all, stop spreading nonsense.
Sveden,why u did 7cm if the safe zone is like 5cm?Im thinking 8cm tops for me,just sayin' 10 is rechable for some poeople,not for me.
Quote from: wannabetaller on August 15, 2014, 11:19:35 AMSveden,why u did 7cm if the safe zone is like 5cm?Im thinking 8cm tops for me,just sayin' 10 is rechable for some poeople,not for me.
I came for maximum 6cm but got caught up in the numbers and those who did 7cm looked fine.
Now when I'm done with it I know for the better that I should have done only 6cm. Preferable 5cm.
10cm is insane in every aspect there is.
Quote from: Sweden on August 15, 2014, 01:40:08 PMI came for maximum 6cm but got caught up in the numbers and those who did 7cm looked fine.
Now when I'm done with it I know for the better that I should have done only 6cm. Preferable 5cm.
10cm is insane in every aspect there is.
I think 7 is good or even 8.If I give so much money to the doctors for the operation I will do the best for it.Imo if u give 10 000 euros or in some case 20-25 000 just to grow only 5 cm,the money and your time is just wasted.
Quote from: wannabetaller on August 15, 2014, 05:04:26 PMI think 7 is good or even 8.If I give so much money to the doctors for the operation I will do the best for it.Imo if u give 10 000 euros or in some case 20-25 000 just to grow only 5 cm,the money and your time is just wasted.
5 cm makes quite a noticeable difference between two people standing next to each other. If you can end up recovering better by lengthening 3 cm less on one segment then that would be a worthy trade off.
You must be logged in to post a reply.