Quotefrom newheights:
I think that most girls would not want a 6'5 guy, but because they are rare and stick out, the girls who are interested in those guys will be all over them. They don't have the largest dating pool, but have the most girls "after them" because of their rarity.
do you understand the definition to paradox.
Quotefrom slimtim:
Nopp 6'0 is enough to live life to its fullest
while I don't agree with everything slimtim states. this is correct, 6 foot is more than enough to live happy, after 6"0 you do get gains but it is exponentially diminishing returns.
for the average of 5"9.5 the population will give both positive and negative discrimination and prejudice at equal distances from this average. because it is a symmetrical graph. therefore the values become 5"7 as the threshold for exponential additions of subsects of the population for greater levels of discrimination, and 6"0 become the value for exponential additions of subsecs of the population for greater levels of women not caring about the addition height and having a lesser preference for that additional height.
read rothbard is correct for 5"7. it is not short, it is in the category of girls thinking it would be nice if you were taller. you are on the borderline of the threshold. because you are on the borderline you can increase all your other desirable characteristics and still live a good life but you will although not short and in the category of it would be better if you were taller, you would still be dished out discrimination for not being tall enough.
5"7 - 5.9.5 (50th percentile) - 6"0 ................ the graph dictates 2.5 inches above and below are the threshold for a 50th percentile height of 5"9.5.
as for girls liking men who are 6"5, it is not close to 10-20%, but your argument in principle is correct. there will always be a subsect of the population who is attracted to anything. there is even a subsect of the population who are attracted to obese women. the reason for the overinflated value being 10-20% probably has psychological grounds based on your on preconception of importance for height. this is subjective profiling for your target population.


