MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Feb 3, 2022, 4:14 am
#1

I understand that a lot of naturally tall people also have long torsos and long wingspans compared to shorter people, but theoretically, what would be the difference between someone with naturally long legs vs. someone with CLL-lengthened legs, given that they have the same torso, arms, etc? Correct me if I'm wrong, but your soft tissue DOES grow as you lengthen and recover; so what would be the major differences?

Like (0)
Posted on Feb 3, 2022, 4:23 am
#2

Quote from: Mulholland Dr on February 03, 2022, 04:20:11 AMIf you are referring to legs' appearances then except scars I don't think you can distinguish anything from natural legs.
And it's a common topic that natural leg generally has better athletic performances.


Regarding the worse athletic performance part, if new soft tissue is slowly grown, shouldn't naturally long legs and CLL-lengthened legs eventually be pretty much equally capable?

Like (0)
Posted on Feb 4, 2022, 9:33 pm
#3

Quote from: ReadRothbard on February 04, 2022, 08:54:03 PMI've heard this theory before by Dr. Donghoon, but I've never head of this being confirmed.


Even if it were true, how exactly would it affect athletic performance? Endurance? Strength?

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics