For 2.5 inches what method is most aesthetically pleasing?

Edit Post

For bi-lateral, not quadrilateral;

Internal v.s. external? Femur v.s. tibia?

Proportions are normal starting.

Edit Post

Wouldn't internal tibia more likely to cause knee pain later?

Edit Post

For example look at dunghyunh, posted here. He looks amazing with just a few scar from external. But his proportion looks normal if not better from before. From Doing ex tibia

Edit Post

They are both average proportion. I am 170cm with 175 wingspan

Edit Post

1:1 more or less.

Edit Post

Yes 8:10. Just concerned how I will look nkd. Also from side view bending. If you see some diarys, person looks fine from front but when bending sideway it looks awkward becus the knee is so low in height.

Easier to hide with clothes on but without no clothes it could look weird in my opinion.

Edit Post

Good news, I remeasured the wingspan and it is at almost 5 foot 10!

Edit Post

Honest i’d be just happy with 5 foot 9. Right at the average. Which is why if I’m just going for 5 to 6 cm I’m considering tibia. Better aesthetic wise, espeically external, just get it done and leave with no worry for 1 year rod removal followup. Femur I’m considering for lower rates of complication. Howverr it’s unlikely that I would shoot for the full 8cm+.

I can afford either and from the US too.

Also are tibias less painful than femur? I hear different  opinions

Edit Post

That is reasonable. To each his own. To me, an extra .5 or 1 inch above the average is not worth the potential complication , pain, and decrease in athletics, and loss of proportionality.