How much longer 169-170 - your suggestion

Edit Post

Quote from: Vx88x on October 05, 2023, 12:57:04 PMThe odds of you walking within 6 months with femur 6cm+ is not very high. And with tibias at 5cm+ theres very little chance you will be walking within 6 months. I am 6 months into my femur and I am not walking yet at 8cm. So YMMV. Anyone who is saying 6 month is plenty of time has not done LL. There is alot that can delay you or go wrong. Good luck mate.

I was walking unassisted after 4 months. I did 8cm on femurs. It’s usually 6 months if you do the max amount like I did. If you only do 6cm, you should be walking by month 4

Edit Post

and precice max will shorten that dramatically

Edit Post

Quote from: dominikochal on October 03, 2023, 04:40:12 PMThank you for your answer. On the one hand, I want to be taller, but on the other hand, I don't want to hide my nkedness for fear that I will look like a dwarf on stilts who has to buy too long shirts for the rest of his life to cover his short torso relative to his legs.

Therefore, it is important to increase it, but neither too little nor too much at the same time so that it is safe for health.

I know it's ideal to not change anything, but being taller will increase my attractiveness from 6/10 to 7/10 on the marriage market.

I don't understand why people are still worried about proportions. It's way more socially beneficial (in my opinion) to be tall and have somewhat skewed proportions rather than being short and having ideal ones. Besides, long-leggedness is often considered peak attractiveness in most societies.

Edit Post

I agree with Philosopher. Nobody except people who care about LL thinks or looks at legs propertions. So unless you do some crazy amount in one segment, where you can barely walk probably like 10 cm, you don't need to worry...

Edit Post

At which doctor will you preform surgery?

Edit Post

I made a mock-up of myself.
on the left I am 170 cm tall.
the second photo is the femur increased by 7.5 cm.
the third photo is femur and tibia at 5.5 cm = 13 cm ( 183 cm all).

what do you think ?

https://imgur.com/a/myOWrLa

Edit Post

Quote from: dominikochal on October 19, 2023, 08:17:27 PMI made a mock-up of myself.
on the left I am 170 cm tall.
the second photo is the femur increased by 7.5 cm.
the third photo is femur and tibia at 5.5 cm = 13 cm ( 183 cm all).

what do you think ?

https://imgur.com/a/myOWrLa
Arms do seem short imo

Edit Post

In my opinion, 13 cms looks reasonable only because your torso seems really long, but in your case i dont think the wingspan is a "huge" problem simply because of the angle from which you took the photo. Usually when you do mockups you qant your phone to be at the level of your belly. Nobody's gonna look at you from that point of view, but I still think 11-12cms might be a better option, considering proportions/height/safety.

Edit Post

from 169.5 cm to 183 cm.
that must make a huge difference with women.

I'll see.
In November, I'm paying for a procedure to lengthen my shin by 6 cm (I hope the surgeon agrees because apparently it only takes 5 cm).

I'm running for politics, so I'll probably put the date in June. I will give myself such a gift for my 30th birthday .

Edit Post

Hello,

I made the final decision. I have 1 life.

tibia-6cm
femur:7.5cm
ratio: 0.8
= 13.5 cm

my height before: 169.5-170
my height after: 183 - 183.5 (6 feet)

I think I will be happy and my dating life will improve.

What do you think ?