MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Jan 12, 2017, 4:00 am
#1

So it appears HEF has it's advantages over the pure external i.e. a bit more comfort and maybe a little faster, less recovery time? Are the risks of permanent knee pain from LON not worth it over the external/HEF or do the advantages from LON outweigh it and is a better option in terms of pain and recovery (and also sleep since it's almost impossible to sleep well with the frames on - also have to sleep on the back and not all people can do that).

Why it concerns me because I heard the risks of knee pain from LON are really not that high as people think they are - it's just a misconception?
External frames, as a general consensus, are the most mentally as well as physically challenging method of LL a person can undergo.

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 12, 2017, 1:07 pm
#2

Tibia nailing has a 5-10% chance of causing knee pain it's nothing like 70% like the reports say. Still 5-10% is still a gamble.

Yes as well to those other concerns external fixators are high in the pain and discomfort stakes. I agree as well do not do external fixators if you cannot sleep on your back as you will have months on end of insomnia. Pin sites are painful a lot of the time as well and walking on fixators is painful also. Not many people could or can tolerate external fixators both mentally and physically

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics