MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Jun 18, 2021, 12:01 pm
#1

i see, reading diaries, majority of people prefer doing LON instead of pure externals.
so what the point to do LON? only in time economy to wear ext fixators?
and what about risks? - bone misalignment, higher risk of infection, etc
or they are all negligible  so the LON becomes the best option?

P.S. i wanted to do pure externals, but now i am doubt maybe to choose LON.

Like (0)
Posted on Jun 19, 2021, 1:25 pm
#2

Quote from: Medium Drink Of Water on June 18, 2021, 07:30:12 PMThe only advantage of LON is that you don't have to wear the fixators as long.  If you have time, do pure externals.

yeah, but what about disadvatages, if they are just slightly higher, so maybe its better to choose LON?
i try to understand logic , why a lot of people choose LON instead pure ext,   or there is only one reason - time economy?

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics