MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 8:32 pm
#31

7or8 cm's would have been better imo. The last one looks bad the others are ok, besides the fact that his arms look too short for me. Most ppl who don't think about proportions woudln't notice his short arms though.

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 8:48 pm
#32

I think he looks bad honestly, much too bad for me to even consider that amount.

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 9:00 pm
#33

It is really hard to tell whether tibia or femur looks better when you are wearing baggy pants and you can't see the knee position clearly. That guys last pic is terrible and in shorts he would have knees way too low. Having LL is about getting away from wearing lifts, if you have to wear them to balance out your proportions then your proportions are off, simple.

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 10:05 pm
#34

Quote from: endomorphisme on April 19, 2015, 08:07:21 PMhe doesn't look nice at all in the last photo

I agree

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 10:51 pm
#35

Last pic proves that 10cm maybe even up to 12cm wouldn't look terrible if you build your upper body. However it also proves that the length needs to be split evenly between the Tibias and femurs. His femurs look ridiculously huge compared to his Tibias even in jeans.

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 20, 2015, 5:30 am
#36

This guy looks very disproportionate. If you think that he looks great go to a psychologist.

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 20, 2015, 6:01 am
#37

if he puts minor lifts inside his shoes that would even out his proportions and he would bang 10/10 chicks.

But i agree that 7 cm max on femur is no problem what so ever Long legs, where do you draw the line?

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 20, 2015, 7:29 am
#38

Quote from: KirP1 on April 20, 2015, 05:30:35 AMThis guy looks very disproportionate. If you think that he looks great go to a psychologist.

lol dumbass

He's got VERY usual long femur-short tibia propotions of a tall man. He just decided to put his pants high up for some reason - no one wears them that high and that obviously gives an illusion of longer femurs. If you disagree, go fk yourself (read: go to a psychologist)

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 20, 2015, 10:38 am
#39

Quote from: exclide on April 20, 2015, 07:29:14 AMlol dumbass

He's got VERY usual long femur-short tibia propotions of a tall man. He just decided to put his pants high up for some reason - no one wears them that high and that obviously gives an illusion of longer femurs. If you disagree, go fk yourself (read: go to a psychologist)

You can't be serious about that, no way is this femur tibia ratio close to something usual. It might have looked ok if he had sticked to 7 but now, his legs look weird and his arms look stumpy.

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 20, 2015, 12:18 pm
#40

Quote from: exclide on April 20, 2015, 07:29:14 AMlol dumbass

He's got VERY usual long femur-short tibia propotions of a tall man. He just decided to put his pants high up for some reason - no one wears them that high and that obviously gives an illusion of longer femurs. If you disagree, go fk yourself (read: go to a psychologist)


haha , the only dumbass here is you.
why you cant see the reality? this guy has super long femurs that look really bad. I havent seen a person with that proportions in my life . show this photo to any person that isnt obsesed with height , and all of them will say the same as me. His proportions are really unnatural and weird.

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics