1) Freedom Of Speech Above All - mods should rarely delete posts and minimize banning even if it means more potential arguments and rules violations
2) Stricter Application of Rules - mods should delete posts, lock thread or ban members when the guidelines are violated.
3) Balance Between The Two - mods should intervene only when necessary, give benefit of the doubt within reason but enforce strictly when it's required.
There's been feedback about rude members who insult others and generate a negative atmosphere on the forum. We want members feedback on how it should be resolved.
Quote from: KiloKAHN on February 12, 2015, 09:21:54 PM When this site was started, the intent was to let posters have more freedom in posting. There were times when we thought about getting more strict with moderation, but when it was suggested, most of the users who responded seemed to have a negative opinion about stricter posting guidelines. It now looks like the popular opinion of the board is swaying the other way and more strict posting guidelines and moderating is what's wanted.
A topic will be posted where everyone can give their feedback so we can reach a decision on this matter. Obviously we're not going to be able to please everyone but we're not ignoring the concerns of the members here.
Should there be stricter moderating and posting guidelines? Do you guys think mods should become more active in deleting things like rudeness & warning rude members or take a relaxed approach?
Reference: Forum Rules of Violation http://www.limblengtheningforum.com/index.php?topic=1007.0
___________
I believe there should be a 3 Strike Policy to keep rude members in check. Members who receive 3 Warnings from the moderators for violating forum guidelines should be partially banned for two weeks automatically.
After the partial ban, mods should then allow the member to return for one final chance or decide to make it a permanent ban , depending on the severity of the violations.