Quote from: ivan on November 09, 2018, 09:53:22 PMI think you are confusing pants inseam with real inseam.
Remember bro your foot is a different bone than your legs so I’m guessing it technically can’t get put on the same measurement as leg length/inseam length
The foot is a part of the leg. But that's not the point - if you are measuring your actual inseam the example I showed above is the one you should be using. If you are buying jeans - your method is the right one. I'm pretty sure if you measure your actual inseam it will turn out your legs are not that short.
Quote from: ivan on November 09, 2018, 11:24:25 PMThe foot is a part of the leg. But that's not the point - if you are measuring your actual inseam the example I showed above is the one you should be using. If you are buying jeans - your method is the right one. I'm pretty sure if you measure your actual inseam it will turn out your legs are not that short.
If that’s the case then I do apologise and it’s 80 cm to foot but just on that mind taking a look at this, it’s an old mock-up I made in 2017 I did them wrong btw the 183 cm mock-up is somewhere between 188-190 cm and the 188 cm is like 195 I can generally tell because of the eye level and if I was to get that amount of cm added to get to 188 6’2 do you think I’d be out of proportion with a 90 inseam to ankle
https://m.imgur.com/o6HhHdw
I’m guessing I wouldn’t be because I’ve seen people who are taller talking about there pants inseam being something like 36 inches at 6’2 which is like 91.
Also it gives this actual topic more information about the proportions issue it originally mentions 😁
I think you look good with the 183 cm (188 cm) cm mock-up.
By the way, your leg to body ratio is 45% which is in the normal range, albeit in the lower range.
Quote from: ivan on November 10, 2018, 12:29:26 AMI think you look good with the 183 cm (188 cm) cm mock-up.
By the way, your leg to body ratio is 45% which is in the normal range, albeit in the lower range.
No problem cheers for the feedback bro nd it’s actually weird to find out my ratio is 45% at 80 cm you’d never think that lol
I don't think it is surprising. Different builds and all.
Statham is of a stockier build with wider bones and more mass. Additionally, he's much older than the first guy. The difference wasn't as starking when Statham was younger:
Pavarotti was taller than both (going by the numbers you provided here), but had the appearance of being shorter in some pics. Ford being by himself in the first pic helps with the effect.
Likewise, being next to a tall, lean woman on heels helps in making you look shorter.
It's just perspective/illusion/etc. because of body builds; from a distance with my boots (due to the 1 inch lift on the heel) I look as tall as 185cm (6'1''ish in American unit) but when up close to me I've heard comments like "you're shorter than I thought" "oh you're not as tall as you look" etc. (because I'm not 185cm. My arm span is !!! But not me I'm just 174; 176 or so with boots 
... )
Even at the doctors when I went to ask about my growth plates & my height/will I grow; when I was asked "how tall are you" and I mentioned 174 she said "wow really your build makes you look taller" and sure sounds great only if I was actually taller
Quote from: kream on November 26, 2018, 04:59:52 PMIt's just perspective/illusion/etc. because of body builds; from a distance with my boots (due to the 1 inch lift on the heel) I look as tall as 185cm (6'1''ish in American unit) but when up close to me I've heard comments like "you're shorter than I thought" "oh you're not as tall as you look" etc. (because I'm not 185cm. My arm span is !!! But not me I'm just 174; 176 or so with boots ... )
Even at the doctors when I went to ask about my growth plates & my height/will I grow; when I was asked "how tall are you" and I mentioned 174 she said "wow really your build makes you look taller" and sure sounds great only if I was actually taller
I know that feel, my wingspan is around 183-185 and I'm 173-174. If you saw me from a distance you might think I was a bit taller, but I just have really wide shoulders and long arms. At my heaviest I had 22-23 inch shoulders so I probably get more odd impressions than I think. I'm just hoping I can get to 24 at 200+ pounds.
Proportions of the very tall - they look like that had some crazy amount of LL but all natural. In my opinion they would look better with leg length reduced by 1/3:
(Manute Bol and Chuck Nevitt)
Quote from: Ascending on November 26, 2018, 08:24:46 PMProportions of the very tall - they look like that had some crazy amount of LL but all natural. In my opinion they would look better with leg length reduced by 1/3:
(Manute Bol and Chuck Nevitt)
Maybe if they had larger frames and 100-200 more pounds they could look decent.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
