MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Jan 20, 2016, 7:43 pm
#21

Quote from: LLuser1 on January 20, 2016, 06:18:20 PMI would pick Paley. Guichet would be my second option.
Please don't put everybody in the same bag. Paley and Guichet are the best. Betz is experienced but not really good because of a bunch of bad cases and dishonest behaviour (salesman). Monegal isn't good technically because he is unexperienced and he is dishonest too. They aren't good options. Patients have told me.


Ok, of course you are entitled to your opinion. This is why people join online communities. I would be more cautious though going so far and using so strong words, calling doctors you never met dishonest and unexperienced for many reasons, some of which are:

1) There are currently patients that are getting treated by these doctors. They read the forum. They have many worries now and one of them should not be the uncertainty whether they made the right choice with a doctor

2) There are many patients here who reported outstanding results and superior care/service by these doctors and their staff, so, at the very least, your words sharply contradict the opinion of people who experienced these doctors first hand. Instead, If I were you, I would invite these patients that supposedly told you, to come here, tell their full story, and contribute to the LL community.

3) Doctors read the forums. Again, these are all professionals with outstanding reputation who achieved a lot in life. Betz for instance developed his own device. It would be deeply offending for these people to come here and see that rumors that they are technically incompetent and lack care are being spread out.

To conclude, you know really well that the most highly regarded doctors have bad cases, and some of the so called budget doctors like the ones in India, Russia, China and Dr. Mitkovic produce outstanding results. It is up to the individual body, psychology etc, not only to the doctor's abilities, which in most cases do not differ.

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 21, 2016, 2:59 pm
#22

I always thought, that Guichets fast recovery programm is quite unique. Does Dr Paley also demand good preparation as Guichet and which one would you choose if recovery time is limited?

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 21, 2016, 3:42 pm
#23

Quote from: Madmax_01 on January 21, 2016, 02:59:09 PMI always thought, that Guichets fast recovery programm is quite unique. Does Dr Paley also demand good preparation as Guichet and which one would you choose if recovery time is limited?


No he doesn't believe in that too much. That's not to say that preparing won't help, but for Paley it's less important

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 21, 2016, 4:51 pm
#24

What I personally really appreciate about Dr. Guichet is that he is VERY conservative. He is not a salesman, but more of a scientist who is very passionate about orthopedic surgery in general.

Whereas many other doctors (including from what I have heard, Dr. Paley, who I still think is an amazing doctor, but out of my price range for tibias - I would go to him for tibias if not for crazy price) will just take your money and tell you what you want to hear, Dr. Guichet is not at all like this. He tells it like it is, all the bad and ugly possibilities that might come with LL, whether you want to hear it or not. I want to do a low amount of lengthening on tibias now, for example, and he keeps telling me not to do tibias because, even for small lengthening amounts, my recovery would be slow.

I still have a lot of research in front of me, but I trust Dr. Guichet, and his opinion is definitely giving me reason for pause.

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 21, 2016, 10:49 pm
#25


Doctors becoming salesmen are disgusting. They smile and say what patients want to hear (no complications at all, quick recovery...) but then you realize all this is false. Patients don' tell the truth about themselves and other patients because they are scared. Do some research and you will see I'm telling the truth about these patients.

Bad and ugly possibilities are mentioned by Paley too. Guichet is more clear about them though. Yellowspike is right.

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 22, 2016, 12:59 am
#26

Quote from: DragonTurtle on January 20, 2016, 05:44:53 AMBut I've narrowed down my choices to Guichet and Paley and it does seem like a very difficult decision. Here's another question, ignoring Guichet's pre-op training, is he actually faster at recovery?


I wouldn't read too much into how many months they say it takes until you're recovered and walking again since the largest factor is your consolidation and neither doctor can control this.  Your consolidation rate determines how soon you can walk again and the sooner you can walk the sooner you'll recover.  I was worried about the same thing when deciding because I wanted to return to normal life as fast as possible and read into their estimates too literally.  There are examples of slow consolidation and recoveries in recent diaries for both doctors.

On the margin, recovery with dr. G may be slightly faster because of the weight bearing aspect and heavy focus on post op PT, but that may also be offset with the extra month of pre-op training.  But I believe any difference from those factors is no where near as significant to faster recovery as bone consolidation is.

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 22, 2016, 1:28 am
#27

I think that Guichet can be considered a salesman too.   He has his own branded albizzia just like betz.   The purpose behind this is to have full control of the price to avoid competitors from undercutting him.  We do this in my business too to protect our sales margins.  We tell our customers that our brand is the "cat's a$$", and they believe us.

Also, the reason I lost respect for Guichet is because of all the drama with leetchlet.   It was a huge publicity and promotion attempt that went wrong in the worst possible way.   I wonder if leechlet was served with a serious gag order to remain silent and force to delete his youtube channel or face a major law suit.

Lastly, I think that he makes more money from the kickbacks from his personal training centers, being the reason why he insists that it be a prerequisite to his operation.  I wouldn't be surprised if there are more patients that go to him for consultation, sign up for the pre-op training, fail at meeting the so called level of fitness, or simply give up, and never go through with the operation.  This would be a nice steady source of income for not doing much and not having to operate.

I could be wrong about all this, but it seems that in this forum too many people are in a trance thinking that he must be right about everything that comes out of his mouth.  I think Guichet is just trying his hardest to have a "unique" type of LL business in favor of making huge profits from this niche market.

I still think Guichet is a good option because he does get results, just like all the top doctors, but he shouldn't have to resort to all these "guerrilla" marketing techniques to justify such a high price. 

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 22, 2016, 9:40 am
#28

Quote from: ouroboros on January 22, 2016, 01:28:52 AMI think that Guichet can be considered a salesman too.   He has his own branded albizzia just like betz.   The purpose behind this is to have full control of the price to avoid competitors from undercutting him.  We do this in my business too to protect our sales margins.  We tell our customers that our brand is the "cat's a$$", and they believe us.

Also, the reason I lost respect for Guichet is because of all the drama with leetchlet.   It was a huge publicity and promotion attempt that went wrong in the worst possible way.   I wonder if leechlet was served with a serious gag order to remain silent and force to delete his youtube channel or face a major law suit.

Lastly, I think that he makes more money from the kickbacks from his personal training centers, being the reason why he insists that it be a prerequisite to his operation.  I wouldn't be surprised if there are more patients that go to him for consultation, sign up for the pre-op training, fail at meeting the so called level of fitness, or simply give up, and never go through with the operation.  This would be a nice steady source of income for not doing much and not having to operate.

I could be wrong about all this, but it seems that in this forum too many people are in a trance thinking that he must be right about everything that comes out of his mouth.  I think Guichet is just trying his hardest to have a "unique" type of LL business in favor of making huge profits from this niche market.

I still think Guichet is a good option because he does get results, just like all the top doctors, but he shouldn't have to resort to all these "guerrilla" marketing techniques to justify such a high price.


I think he's just passionate about what he does.. Yeah, he'd make a ton of money, but he deserves it. He has systematically created a nail that has had huge success due to its capabilities (e.g. Full weight bearing) and has his patients in the best possible condition before they undergo surgery. He doesn't accept anyone that isn't ready to the proper standards and is forthright about his track record and the possible complications.. Someone that adds that much value has obviously taken the time to research the shortcomings of other lengthening methods (e.g. Long lenfthening periods, long periods with no weight bearing, extreme pain due to a lack of preparation.... All the aspects about lengthening that most takes its toll on the patient) and has overcome them.

The best salesman don't need to sell anything. The product and service sells itself and he knows this. So he is a money maker in the best possible way... By adding more value then anyone else in his field.

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 22, 2016, 12:12 pm
#29

What is considered as the "leechlet PR-stunt drama" ?

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 22, 2016, 5:37 pm
#30

Quote from: Deads on January 22, 2016, 09:40:03 AMI think he's just passionate about what he does.. Yeah, he'd make a ton of money, but he deserves it. He has systematically created a nail that has had huge success due to its capabilities (e.g. Full weight bearing) and has his patients in the best possible condition before they undergo surgery. He doesn't accept anyone that isn't ready to the proper standards and is forthright about his track record and the possible complications.. Someone that adds that much value has obviously taken the time to research the shortcomings of other lengthening methods (e.g. Long lenfthening periods, long periods with no weight bearing, extreme pain due to a lack of preparation.... All the aspects about lengthening that most takes its toll on the patient) and has overcome them.

The best salesman don't need to sell anything. The product and service sells itself and he knows this. So he is a money maker in the best possible way... By adding more value then anyone else in his field.


I want to believe this too.  I'm rooting for someone to come up with an innovative solution to LL.   

There is just something about Guichet that doesn't seem right to me.

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics