I heard many opinions on this bulletin board that parihar is a good doctor. However, he does not seem to do so much cosmetic bone extension. I am also concerned about the Indian environment. Is he a really good doctor?
At least he doesn't have disastrous cases or a bad reputation that we know of.
I don't see why people go to the doctors with a legitimately bad reputation, if they really must risk things even further by having CLL in India.
Yes he has few CLL cases and that too with Precice even fewer. He is considered a very good doctor in LL and deformity correction (outside of the CLL scene). But given that that you have reservations about going to India and that the price differences are not much between him and other doctors now especially with internal rods, you are better off going to the US.
parhar, sarin, sringari, tewani etc.
they all same sh!te.
STAY AWAY
Quote from: TinyTL on April 28, 2019, 07:54:02 AMparhar, sarin, sringari, tewani etc.
they all same sh!te.
STAY AWAY
No, Parihar is good
http://www.limblengtheningforum.com/index.php?topic=634.0
http://www.limblengtheningforum.com/index.php?topic=3746.434
Unless the mods are promoting Parihar for some reason, he looks fine.
I am lost in giotikas and parihar. giotikas is more expensive than parihar. So I would like to receive it at a cheap and reputed parihar.
I'm not sure Giotikas is more expensive depend on the surgery.
We also don't have a diary with Dr Suhas Shah, which looks good to me.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
