It's by Dr. Lee: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654310/
The scary part to me was reading that 14 Precice 2 nails out of 46 had a "breakage of rotation coupling". I am not very sure what that means, but the obvious meaning is that the two broken bone segments might not stay rotationally aligned.
So while doing femur lengthening, if this complication happened, if you "twist" your tibia (with your hands), the upper part of the femur might not also twist equally?
I hope I am wrong.
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
2017 paper showing results from Precice 2 [doesn't look very promising]
Posted on Dec 31, 2017, 6:50 am
#1
Posted on Dec 31, 2017, 8:06 am
#2
I read through the paper again and the defect above was categorized as a "problem" (there are 3 grades of issues: "problem", "obstacle" and "complication" in that increasing order of severity). So maybe it wasn't that big a deal.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Limb lengthening cost in Vietnam vs other countries which is the cheapest option for a 5cm length gain
ExpertLimb631
7 replies • 17 hours ago
Ultimate Guide to how to grow taller naturally and permanently
scanGuru
8 replies • 17 hours ago
Ultimate Guide to Precice Stryde
SeekerFan138
2 replies • 1 day ago
Is forearm lengthening safe?
Curious597
3 replies • 1 day ago
Limb Lengthening Surgery Without External Fixators Is It Possible with Latest Internal Lengthening Nails
ExpertBone463
7 replies • 7 hours ago