Lengthen more than 10 cm and you're fked considering you have a normal proportion like everyone else. Some guys even try to measure their sitting heights to the mms, lol. What a bunch of pathetic losers. You will make a decision during the lengthening period. Look at yourself in the mirror and decide for yourself. If you look good, you look good. If not, call it a day!
Torso Length is more important without clothes, clothes on torso length barely matters unless extreme. Also head size varies in width and length although not much: http://www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Human/Human_sizes.html
QuoteTorso Length is more important without clothes, clothes on torso length barely matters unless extreme. Also head size varies in width and length although not much: http://www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Human/Human_sizes.html
exactly. very smart comment here.
its not a simple yes or no answer. the truth is there are 2 components to this question, how good do you loo when you have no clothes on, and how good do you look when you have clothes on.
as you begin to lengthen in extremes you will first look bad with no clothes on, followed by looking bad with clothes on if you continue to lengthen.
I find it important to look good while nked. and by nked I mean at the beach or in bed or the change rooms.
Quote from: GROWtalORdieTRYING1 on September 22, 2014, 01:36:35 PMexactly. very smart comment here.
its not a simple yes or no answer. the truth is there are 2 components to this question, how good do you loo when you have no clothes on, and how good do you look when you have clothes on.
as you begin to lengthen in extremes you will first look bad with no clothes on, followed by looking bad with clothes on if you continue to lengthen.
I find it important to look good while nked. and by nked I mean at the beach or in bed or the change rooms.
this will put things into perspective: http://www.limblengtheningforum.com/index.php?topic=53.0
Yeesh most of them look horrible. Even the first guy who only did 5.5 cm appear disgusting. Can anyone confirm if the end result is this bad?
Maybe his proportions are more fragile as he was short to begin with?
Quote from: Uppland on September 22, 2014, 10:30:36 PMYeesh most of them look horrible. Even the first guy who only did 5.5 cm appear disgusting. Can anyone confirm if the end result is this bad?
Maybe his proportions are more fragile as he was short to begin with?
I think a big reason why it looks bad in some of the cases is because of muscle atrophy, i look slightly weird now with only underwear because my thighs are significantly thinner, but its easy for me to recognize that it will look completely normal when i regain that muscle mass. Although i only did 4.3 cm
Quote from: Uppland on September 22, 2014, 11:30:53 PMFeel like longer tibia give off a more "manly" impression while the opposite can be said for femur anyone agree?
Watched myself in the mirror and I actually think I look kind of weird so maybe it's all in my head.
I agree that a longer tibia looks more manly, with longer femurs it makes the person look kind of clumsy because of the low knees and might make a person seem shorter than he is.
Agreed I hate how small tibias and long femurs look on anyone although females can sometimes pull it off. To me equal femurs to tibias is the perfect aesthetically pleasing look however I know that's bad for several reasons so i decided to do my femurs whenever possible after my tibias. As far as torso length I don't think matters at all on clothes unless you go to extremes like your legs being over 65 percent of your height out of clothes is trickier but overall if you broaden your shoulders and get a strong upper body instead of being skinny you won't call any attention to yourself at the beach
You must be logged in to post a reply.
