I understand that a lot of naturally tall people also have long torsos and long wingspans compared to shorter people, but theoretically, what would be the difference between someone with naturally long legs vs. someone with CLL-lengthened legs, given that they have the same torso, arms, etc? Correct me if I'm wrong, but your soft tissue DOES grow as you lengthen and recover; so what would be the major differences?
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
Differences between the naturally tall and CLL patients
Posted on Feb 3, 2022, 4:14 am
#1
Posted on Feb 3, 2022, 4:23 am
#2
Quote from: Mulholland Dr on February 03, 2022, 04:20:11 AMIf you are referring to legs' appearances then except scars I don't think you can distinguish anything from natural legs.
And it's a common topic that natural leg generally has better athletic performances.
Regarding the worse athletic performance part, if new soft tissue is slowly grown, shouldn't naturally long legs and CLL-lengthened legs eventually be pretty much equally capable?
Posted on Feb 4, 2022, 9:33 pm
#3
Quote from: ReadRothbard on February 04, 2022, 08:54:03 PMI've heard this theory before by Dr. Donghoon, but I've never head of this being confirmed.
Even if it were true, how exactly would it affect athletic performance? Endurance? Strength?
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Limb lengthening cost in Vietnam vs other countries which is the cheapest option for a 5cm length gain
isaac93
7 replies • 6 days ago
Ultimate Guide to how to grow taller naturally and permanently
aiden95
8 replies • 6 days ago
Ultimate Guide to Precice Stryde
hannah2001
2 replies • 1 week ago
Is forearm lengthening safe?
alexander1999
3 replies • 1 week ago
Limb Lengthening Surgery Without External Fixators Is It Possible with Latest Internal Lengthening Nails
emily1999
7 replies • 6 days ago