Hey, been lurking on the site for a while, and had a quick question - has anyone heard of purposefully decreasing the rate of lengthening for the sake of better recovery?
Looking at Guichet's results it seems like weight bearing and pre-op training is hugely beneficial (no surprise), but in terms of soft tissue damage/emphasis on athletic recovery, it seems to me that if you slowed down the lengthening process you'd get better results. Using femurs as the case in point, why not reduce the rate of lengthening from 1 mm to 0.5 mms per day ... I know the fear would be premature consolidation but tibias are lengthened at that rate generally and seem to do ok?
Basically was looking to the future with Synoste and thinking about the possibilities of retaining (somewhat) basic functioning/walking while lengthening. I don't know of any fundamental issues with lengthening bone/soft tissue as an adult following besides closure of growth plates, so it seems like if you could reduce the rate of expansion to get closer to that pubescent growth spurt you might have less or no effects.
What do you think??
Posted on May 1, 2016, 11:04 pm
#1
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Limb lengthening cost in Vietnam vs other countries which is the cheapest option for a 5cm length gain
ExpertLimb631
7 replies • 1 day ago
Ultimate Guide to how to grow taller naturally and permanently
scanGuru
8 replies • 1 day ago
Ultimate Guide to Precice Stryde
SeekerFan138
2 replies • 2 days ago
Is forearm lengthening safe?
Curious597
3 replies • 2 days ago
Limb Lengthening Surgery Without External Fixators Is It Possible with Latest Internal Lengthening Nails
ExpertBone463
7 replies • 1 day ago