Sound too bad? Will it be a problem? Hopefully 89 after working glutes and stretching routine
Worried because people here who are even 5'5" have a SH of 90 cm, feels like I sit on level with women who are 5'2"
86.5/177.5=0.487
youll still be in the upper range of normal
Quote from: Scarface on October 18, 2020, 04:17:16 PMSound too bad? Will it be a problem? Hopefully 89 after working glutes and stretching routine
Worried because people here who are even 5'5" have a SH of 90 cm, feels like I sit on level with women who are 5'2"
Yeah my SH is 88 cm which corresponds to an average 5'7"-5'9" and I'm only 5'5".
Your aesthetic might take a tiny hit but it's a fairly normal variation although I don't get how it's in the upper range?
It should be in the lower range since the normal/average should be 0.5?
My SH is 87cm, I am a male 158cm (5'2).
How did you guys measure?
height - inseam = upper body
158cm - 71cm = 87cm
It's identical which I measured by sitting on a hard table with mirror next to me and scale.
Set on the hard surface, lean back next to a wall.
Height 159cm with setting height 86cm.
I am an Asian. Asian people tends to have short legs, meaning higher setting height.
wow I'm 169 cm and have barely the same SH
I’m 5’10 with a 94cm sitting height. There’s not that big of a difference so I think it should be fine.
My SH is 93-95 cm, I’m 5’6”.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
