MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Mar 1, 2015, 5:28 am
#51

Quote from: meursault on March 01, 2015, 05:22:20 AMI already posted data that obliterated yours and was actually relevant to the topic at hand, unlike you just posting random height statistics from random countries in threads about ideal height and such. I'm a very strong believer in watching what women do, instead of listening to what they say. Here's an example of watching what women do, you should try it sometime.

How distorted do u think are the members' worldview of the importance of height?


What is your source? We need to determine its credibility before we are misleaded by it  How distorted do u think are the members' worldview of the importance of height?

Either way, this only CONFIRMS my hypothesis that there is a height that is "too tall" How distorted do u think are the members' worldview of the importance of height?

As I have already said countless times, if we are talking about America, then the "too tall height" is about 185-188. 6'2 is 188.

From 6'2 to 6'5 to 6'8, do you notice that there is a plateau? Before it falls and falls and falls?

In essence, based on your infographic, the only thing I can conclude is that the tallest you should lengthen is 6'2 or 188, in the USA (if that Is where the source is)..

This CONFIRMS my anecdotal observations of gay guys and girls, that 183 is too tall in Singapore. 188 is too tall in America with an average height of 178, so it stands to reason that for Singapore with average height of 174, the "too tall" figure is 184 (very close to what I said, 183) = there is a 10 cm difference between average height & "too tall".

Also, look at 6'3 and 6'4. Less likelihood than 6'2. Which supports my theory (or in fact, it is more of a law now), ie the law of reversed attractions at too tall heights. I nailed it on the spot that 186-188 cm is probably too tall for the states. 6'2 is indeed the best height in the states, and any more is too tall.

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 1, 2015, 5:30 am
#52

.

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 1, 2015, 5:39 am
#53

Quote from: meursault on March 01, 2015, 05:30:23 AM.


Just had a CVA?

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 1, 2015, 5:42 am
#54

Quote from: ItsMyLife on March 01, 2015, 05:28:47 AMWhat is your source? We need to determine its credibility before we are misleaded by it  How distorted do u think are the members' worldview of the importance of height?

Either way, this only CONFIRMS my hypothesis that there is a height that is "too tall" How distorted do u think are the members' worldview of the importance of height?

As I have already said countless times, if we are talking about America, then the "too tall height" is about 185-188. 6'2 is 188.

From 6'2 to 6'5 to 6'8, do you notice that there is a plateau? Before it falls and falls and falls?

In essence, based on your infographic, the only thing I can conclude is that the tallest you should lengthen is 6'2 or 188, in the USA (if that Is where the source is)..

This CONFIRMS my anecdotal observations of gay guys and girls, that 183 is too tall in Singapore. 188 is too tall in America with an average height of 178, so it stands to reason that for Singapore with average height of 174, the "too tall" figure is 184 (very close to what I said, 183) = there is a 10 cm difference between average height & "too tall".

Also, look at 6'3 and 6'4. Less likelihood than 6'2. Which supports my theory (or in fact, it is more of a law now), ie the law of reversed attractions at too tall heights. I nailed it on the spot that 186-188 cm is probably too tall for the states. 6'2 is indeed the best height in the states, and any more is too tall.


girls say one thing and do the other. their heads are saying '6foot2 is perfect taller is too much' but their pussies are saying 'omg look how tall and dominant he is (6foot7 guy), fk me!'. its same as how they say prettyboys are the best but at the party you bet theyre banging that 6foot7 masculine robust hunk, not the fragile boned 6foot2 prettyboy.

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 1, 2015, 6:07 am
#55

Quote from: Shor7Guy on March 01, 2015, 05:42:38 AMgirls say one thing and do the other. their heads are saying '6foot2 is perfect taller is too much' but their pussies are saying 'omg look how tall and dominant he is (6foot7 guy), fk me!'. its same as how they say prettyboys are the best but at the party you bet theyre banging that 6foot7 masculine robust hunk, not the fragile boned 6foot2 prettyboy.


possible and defensible point of view, unlike the other guy mersault.
but, I think, this is so-called the "height bitches" as a member posted here. Some girls JUST WANT TALL GUYS.
but I think, most of them, don't want guys who are too tall to the extent of being giant. perhaps if the guy is clothed in athletic wear (basketball jersey)? but in an ordinary situation nope, above 6'2 is probably  a freak

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics